![]() ![]() I'm a photographer, not a mad scientist YMMV. just because Adobe imposes a certain color rendering in their profiles. but using preset on top of profile that you do not like is like whitebalancing OOC JPGīetter vs what exactly ? most of people simply using that to get something alternative vs profiles supplied by Adobe. Whom who that doesn't who i don't know and it doesn't really matter. □īottomline there is no equivalent to X-rite or Spyderchkrs solution that is available for LR. To a certain point yes, but using software with UI from the early 80's hosted on website with flashing neon titles does not make it any easier. Still professionals all over the world use it daily to get better results, my self included.ģ. True, but the result i pretty much the same as he X-riteĢ. better results require investment (time & effort) in mastering the tools.ġ. Which specific software are you using to create icc/icm profiles for C1 for your repro work that can't handle x-rite passport target (if you so inclined to use that) ?ġ) spydercheckr OEM software does not create DCP profiles, it creates recipes/presets.Ģ) with x-rite you do not control anything - the mere fact that X-Rite dropped generation of icc/icm profiles (that was an option in prerelease/beta version) speaks volumes what price "easy and straight forward" means.ģ) and for the easy and straight forward - OOC JPG is easy and straightforward, but you nevertheless use raw converter. My product photography work cannot make use of those same IN Camera profiles and this is where the Colour checker Passport profiles could come into play. This is obtained in a very controlled work environment.but only for 2D flat art work. This works well and I do get very good colour. My repro work is dependent upon making In Camera profile and then importing it for use in C1. How accurately you can reproduce a different (not a different x-rite passport, but totally different type), measured, target in your converter with your "colour checker passport profile" ? what is the max/avg dE2K for the set of patches ? I am just curious as your claim reproduction work and I'd assume you don't go by your eyes, but by some instrument measurements (with spectrophotometer) to compare how your conversion with profile fares against that ? a plenty of software does that, for example argyll or rawdigger + argyll or dcamprof + argyll, etc, etc. You can create icc/icm profiles for C1 using X-Rite passport target. I understand that Capture One Pro ver 9 supports opening and then using DNG files, but it does not support the colour checker passport profiles. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |